Skip to main content

Should you take that $100k job offer? A Tale on PPP.

If you took a notebook and pen, and travelled the world, and you wrote down the prices of a pack of 6 locally produced eggs in every supermarket in the world, what would you discover? Apart from the fact that you may have had a lousy trip, you will realize how cheap it is to buy eggs in Bucharest (Romania) and how it is more expensive to by eggs in Dubai (UAE).

In a perfectly competitive world, all eggs everywhere would cost the same after factoring in the exchange rate. Same goes for Crude oil. Or for a Mattel toy car. Or for a Lego toy box. These should cost the same everywhere in the world. Except it is not the case.

The PPP theory states that, over a long period of time, the cost of similar goods in 2 countries would be the same if you converted the currencies at the prevailing exchange rates. However, this rarely happens.

Due to a host of reasons; transaction costs, government interventions, tariffs & duties, non-competitive prices or even sticky prices (wherein even with changing valuation of the currency or changing demand & supply for a product, the price of the good doesn’t change as it’s eventually cheaper to keep the same price) – the prices across countries for every day goods like eggs are not the same.

The famous Big Mac Index:

The big Mac index has been curated and tracked by The Economist since the 1980’s as an informal way to measure PPP. (Why the Big Mac burger – the burger is made in the exact same way in every country with the same ingredients and process which makes it a standard product useful to use for comparison) 

The Big Mac PPP exchange rate between two countries is obtained by dividing the price of a Big Mac in one country (in its currency) by the price of a Big Mac in another country (in its currency). This value is then compared with the prevailing exchange rate - and then this helps to determine if the actual currency is under or over valued versus the other currency basis the current exchange rate.

Consider the example of Pound and USD:


Consider a second example - A more relevant one:

PPP changes every year – as the prices of goods & services keeps changing due to inflation, change in production costs, demand – supply ratios as well as other reasons. 

Why do you need to consider PPP before saying yes to that swanky new job outside your country?

From the above example, we can see that while NOMINAL exchange rate for one dollar is 70 rupees, the actual rate is 20 rupees. Hence if you were offered a salary of 1 Lakh USD versus your current Indian salary of 42 lakhs - what would you consider more attractive? 70 lakhs INR (1 lakh USD converted to INR using current exchange rate) seemed like a no brainer – live the American dream while also most likely save more. But she was smarter than that.

Well, in India, you could purchase 42 lakh worth of products; in USA, however, the equivalent value you would be purchase is 20 lakhs (1 Lakh USD * 20 Rupees per dollar) – hence leading a more lavish life in India versus USA in terms of how much you could possibly buy.

Tying this example with our Big Mac graph,  you can also see that in India, the sandwich would cost you around 2.5 USD but in the USA, the same sandwich would cost you 5.5 USD – more than twice. While the Big Mac index is only an informal and light hearted guide, it suffices to say that to maintain a similar standard of living in USA, she would have to spend twice as much as in India. 

However:

If you did want to work a few years abroad and then return back to India, you would get a huge conversion benefit of 70 rupees for every dollar saved! (so do consider that)

Summary

PPP or Purchasing Power Parity is an important macro-economic indicator which measures the relation between two currencies. Apart from the economy, it is also an important & useful factor when you have offices in almost every continent, when flights now connect you to almost every corner of the world and when most brands are now omnipresent – whether in Bulgaria or Uruguay. Understanding this concept and seeing where this applies in your own life will empower you to make better decisions – like in my friends case – where she leveraged her knowledge and negotiated for a higher salary.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F.I.R.E - What Financial Independence & Retire Early Means

My mum loves sending me articles of how other 30-40 years old manage their finances. Recently, she shared with me an article that talked about how retired millionaires under 40 navigated the corona virus situation. But to be honest, I was not worried how they navigated the complete collapse in economies globally. I mean don't get me wrong, it is important - something I will cover in a later post. But I was more intrigued about the first part. How on earth were they able to retire as millionaires under 40!! Upon doing some online digging, I came to read about the concept of FIRE, again. I have heard this before. Have you? Or are you completely clueless - the way I was, the first time my colleague mentioned it to me? FIRE - as the title explains - refers to individuals that have gained financial independence and are now able to retire early - as they have reached the point where they don't have to work for money anymore. They can now do something they love, not having to sell awa

Breaking down the 2008 Recession

It’s been more than a decade since the 2008 recession but a lot of people still don’t know what actually caused it, just like a lot of people do not know what caused the great depression. It’s important to learn and understand these, as they give you insights into what happens when financial instruments are abused and the government may or may not do its part and the importance of economic policies and how they can effectively bring countries out of tough times. What caused the 2008 recession? The US Fed had lowered interest rates after 9/11 to keep the economy going – to ensure that money was available for very cheap to every American. The low interest rates combined with the Fed’s home ownership policy encouraged more people to buy houses at low interest rates. The intentions were not bad. As a consequence, the total mortgage debt was as its peak by 2008. As more Americans bought homes, the real estate market boomed dramatically in the years between 2002 & 2008. Banks were en